Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Rahul Ponginan

      Please click here for a short but important announcement   03/26/17

      Dear Users Our Commercial and Academic users around the world can use these same forums here as before i.e. the Altair Support Forum , Commercial users from India with solver queries can go to the Solver Forum for India Commercial Users , Academic Users from India and AOC India Participants are requested to go to the Forum for India Academic Users and AOC India Participants , We will be tending to all queries in all the forums promptly as before, thank you for your understanding. 

Nachiket Kadu

Members
  • Content count

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nachiket Kadu

  1. Hello Prashant Sir Any solution for the said problem yet?
  2. Hi I am trying a quasi static simulation in Radioss. My final time is around 1.1 sec. The simulation run good till 0.5 secs but after 0.5sec with increase in pressure the components just penetrates and crosses over another component. Can anyone help me with this regards?
  3. Hi Sir I have attached the out file. Please help me out with the issue. Email Id: arun_venkatesh.t@lmw.net.in Guide_tube_mat_law_0001.out
  4. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi I am trying to simulate a model wherein i am pushing steel ring over a rubber hose. I am getting little high energy error, i suspect it to be due to contact. I tried giving igap values but there is no effect of it. can anyone please suggest some inputs. Basic Contact inputs given :Istf: 4, Igap:2, Inacti:6, Iform2. There are no initial penetration or intersections in the model
  5. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George Yes, Agreed! Thats why i gave stress strain curve for mat law 69. But the model seems to penetrate with other components.
  6. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George I have doubt regarding change in material law. For the same simulation if i give Mat law 69 instead of mat law 42, the simulation animation results shows weird behavior. With same contact condition if u change the MAT law why this behavior is observed.
  7. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George I got your point, i did some changes and now energy error as well as dynamic effect which we were talking has been neutralized. Thank you for your suggestions.
  8. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George Anything you can suggest to counter this problem?
  9. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George Also if you change Istf back to 4 the model behaves normally under initial pressure, but with high contact energy.
  10. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George It starts to behave abnormally after few steps not at start itself. Moreover i ran this case in my previous model it worked well and the only problem i was facing was high contact energy. So to first encounter the problem of contact energy i gave pressure value from 0.05 sec as initial pressure will increase internal energy and so the energy error.
  11. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George Glad that initial contact energy is reduced, but as u can see in rad file ,for pressure i gave tabled value from 0.05 sec as 0.21. The reason for giving this was to first eliminate the contact energy error exclusively. But now when i give pressure from initial point itself i.e. from 0, the animation will show you bizarre results. i have attached screenshot for changes made.
  12. Brake Squeal Analysis using Optistruct

    Hi It is already available in optistruct tutorials under help. OS-1371: Brake Squeal Analysis of Brake Assembly
  13. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George Thanks for resolving query for nature of graph. I hope you will update me regarding energy error soon.
  14. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George I have another query, while i am plotting any graph be it energy or the force, the nature of graph is not smooth. It is have having lots of crests and trough. Can you suggest me something for smoothing i already have applied Time history O/P freq as 0.0001. I have attached a force curve for your reference. The black curve denotes what i am expecting.
  15. viscous damper

    Hi You can use CBUSH which defines a generalized spring-damper structural element. I hope this is what you are looking for.
  16. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi George I have sent you the files.
  17. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi One thing is the node numbers at which the energy error is high belongs to a single component and is the only solid element entity.
  18. Energy error of around 40%

    Hi I tried increasing gapmin but the effect is less comparatively. I havent given any friction value for the simulation. here is the out file for reference.
  19. MAT card for rubber.

    Hi Thanks, i l try it in Radioss then.
  20. MAT card for rubber.

    Hi Can anyone suggest me a material card for rubber for 2-d elements for NL-quasistatic analysis. I have already tried Matx42 & Matx82 but solution wont converge for lower values of youngs modulus.
  21. MAT card for rubber.

    Hi Mathe card support only solid element i guess
  22. Modal & direct frequency analysis

    Hi Conversion of structural damping to viscous damping will be purely based on the frequency interest, for that you may run normal mode analysis prior to dynamic analysis. while specifying frequency of interest in PARAM,W3 make sure frequency unit is radian per time.
  23. Creating superelement.

    Hi Happy New Year to all! I am trying to create super elements if any tutorial is available kindly share it. I want to do "Static Condensation (PARAM, EXTOUT or CMSMETH (GUYAN))". Regards
  24. Creating superelement.

    Hi Only difference i can see is the load step.You didnt mention the SPC data and force. Is that what you changed?
  25. Creating superelement.

    Hi Prakash Yes it solved. what was the mistake??
×